3 May 2024
The art of remote design: Accelerating outcomes with self-critique
Transitioning to fully remote work was relatively smooth in many aspects. The increase in quality, focused work time was a welcome change, but the sudden absence of immediate feedback felt like hitting a roadblock.
In the office, a quick turn to a colleague for a gut check was commonplace. Whether it was another designer offering feedback on everything from copy to interactions, or a project collaborator providing context and a fresh perspective, the availability of instant feedback was invaluable.
However, in a remote setting, this dynamic changes. While tools like Figma facilitate collaboration, the immediacy of in-person feedback is often lost. Waiting for critiques or scheduling calls introduces delays, hindering the iterative design process.
How can I make this better?
When I first started out in design, my primary focus was on delivery. Perhaps I was so consumed by meeting deadlines that I didn't allocate enough time for refining my work. This stemmed from my lack of experience in knowing when to push back, doing too much, and accurately estimating work. I can't pinpoint exactly when this mindset shifted, but recently, I've noticed I find myself asking: 'How can I make this better?' This simple question serves as the catalyst for my self-critique process and propels me toward design improvement.
As I reflect on this question, I delve into key aspects of my design, ensuring the information architecture is sound, the copy is clear and concise for users, the components are well-chosen, the layout is readable, and accessibility is prioritised for all users, including those relying on screen readers or keyboard-only navigation. The list goes on and on. With this simple question, I can self-critique before involving others. I then refine my designs, set them aside for a while, revisit them, and ask the question again.
Consider these additional steps to enhance your self-critique process, polish your designs, and craft more impactful user experiences:
Align your designs with a set of design principles to ensure adherence to predefined constraints. Constraints are good. They help with product cohesiveness.
Refer to Jakob Nielsen's Ten Usability Heuristics often. These guidelines are timeless and always serve as a reality check for anything I’m working on.
Check out the Laws of UX. You may be using these without even knowing it. Worth buying the book and looking over every so often.
Personally, I find inspiration in Dieter Rams' 10 Principles of Good Design, so much so that I have a copy framed beside my desk. While these principles are traditionally applied to physical products, one maxim particularly resonates with me: 'Good design is as little design as possible.'
In conclusion, leverage the focused time that remote work offers to continuously refine your designs. By embracing a culture of self-critique and drawing upon established principles, we can set a high standard for our craft and quality. Remember to gather feedback from peers, colleagues, and users to further enhance your designs.